From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 18901 invoked by alias); 29 Aug 2013 20:56:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 18892 invoked by uid 89); 29 Aug 2013 20:56:00 -0000 Received: from rock.gnat.com (HELO rock.gnat.com) (205.232.38.15) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-SHA encrypted) ESMTPS; Thu, 29 Aug 2013 20:56:00 +0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.8 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: rock.gnat.com Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B2EC1164B1; Thu, 29 Aug 2013 16:56:06 -0400 (EDT) Received: from rock.gnat.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rock.gnat.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id wz2--cVotvTz; Thu, 29 Aug 2013 16:56:06 -0400 (EDT) Received: from joel.gnat.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C9F51164A3; Thu, 29 Aug 2013 16:56:05 -0400 (EDT) Received: by joel.gnat.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 988B4C3D74; Thu, 29 Aug 2013 13:55:57 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2013 20:56:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: Tom Tromey Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: RFC: gdb web page patch for git conversion Message-ID: <20130829205557.GA3315@adacore.com> References: <87ob8gp82d.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87ob8gp82d.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-SW-Source: 2013-08/txt/msg00892.txt.bz2 Hi Tom, On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 02:15:38PM -0600, Tom Tromey wrote: > Here's the patch I came up with for converting the gdb web pages to git. FWIW, it looks good to me. > I vaguely remember that there is some other crucial step after > committing, maybe in order to push the changes to the FSF? I don't > remember any details about it; so if you know, please respond. Yes. Committing to the sourceware CVS automatically gets the sourceware web pages updated, but then we need to push the same change to the CVS at savannah. I've been doing that by maintaining a git mirror of the CVS repo, and cvsexportcommit'ing to both CVS. I can take care of that part. -- Joel