From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 12021 invoked by alias); 20 Aug 2013 15:20:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 12011 invoked by uid 89); 20 Aug 2013 15:20:07 -0000 X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-4.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_THREADED,RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 Received: from sibelius.xs4all.nl (HELO glazunov.sibelius.xs4all.nl) (83.163.83.176) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.84/v0.84-167-ge50287c) with ESMTP; Tue, 20 Aug 2013 15:20:06 +0000 Received: from glazunov.sibelius.xs4all.nl (kettenis@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by glazunov.sibelius.xs4all.nl (8.14.5/8.14.3) with ESMTP id r7KFJw5X030512; Tue, 20 Aug 2013 17:19:58 +0200 (CEST) Received: (from kettenis@localhost) by glazunov.sibelius.xs4all.nl (8.14.5/8.14.3/Submit) id r7KFJwIa000280; Tue, 20 Aug 2013 17:19:58 +0200 (CEST) Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2013 15:20:00 -0000 Message-Id: <201308201519.r7KFJwIa000280@glazunov.sibelius.xs4all.nl> From: Mark Kettenis To: tromey@redhat.com CC: macro@codesourcery.com, gdb-patches@sourceware.org In-reply-to: <87k3jgiege.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> (message from Tom Tromey on Tue, 20 Aug 2013 09:12:17 -0600) Subject: Re: [PATCH] remove ECOFF References: <1376936369-30712-1-git-send-email-tromey@redhat.com> <87k3jgiege.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> X-SW-Source: 2013-08/txt/msg00542.txt.bz2 > From: Tom Tromey > Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2013 09:12:17 -0600 > > Maciej> The MIPS target wants to use minimal ECOFF debug information > Maciej> that is stored in ELF binaries in the so called PDR or Procedure > Maciej> Descriptor Record section [1]. > > Maciej> Support for PDR unwinding (mips-mdebug-tdep.[ch]) was removed a > Maciej> while ago from GDB sources > > Maciej> I think this is a serious shortcoming of GDB on the MIPS target and a > Maciej> good argument in favour to having this PDR unwinding support. > > It's fine by me if you want to resurrect all the code. I don't even > mind dropping my patch. > > If you have a way to test the ECOFF code, then great. I'd appreciate it > if you could volunteer to test whatever patches modify these readers. I think Maciej concerns for MIPS pretty much mirror my concerns for Alpha. I should be able to test stuff on Alpha, but not in the next three weeks.