From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 29005 invoked by alias); 19 Aug 2013 20:42:21 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 28996 invoked by uid 89); 19 Aug 2013 20:42:21 -0000 X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_NO autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 Received: from rock.gnat.com (HELO rock.gnat.com) (205.232.38.15) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.84/v0.84-167-ge50287c) with ESMTP; Mon, 19 Aug 2013 20:42:20 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6CA71162C8; Mon, 19 Aug 2013 16:42:23 -0400 (EDT) Received: from rock.gnat.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rock.gnat.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id hiYIwPXsjAw0; Mon, 19 Aug 2013 16:42:23 -0400 (EDT) Received: from joel.gnat.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BEDB811622A; Mon, 19 Aug 2013 16:42:23 -0400 (EDT) Received: by joel.gnat.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 52F5AC26DA; Mon, 19 Aug 2013 13:42:17 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 19 Aug 2013 20:42:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: Jan Kratochvil Cc: Andreas Arnez , gdb-patches@sourceware.org, Andreas Krebbel Subject: Re: [PATCH] Skip VDSO when reading SO list Message-ID: <20130819204217.GD4346@adacore.com> References: <87d2p9oi4i.fsf@br87z6lw.de.ibm.com> <20130819182907.GA2145@host2.jankratochvil.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20130819182907.GA2145@host2.jankratochvil.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-SW-Source: 2013-08/txt/msg00525.txt.bz2 > Fedora is using a similar patch but that is IMO a wrong workaround: > http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/gdb.git/tree/gdb-core-open-vdso-warning.patch If others can benefit from the patch, and the patch has no or little adverse effect, I'd suggest putting the patch in the FSF tree, especially since glib patches are not necessarily trivial to install for the average user, not to mention the fact that the user may not even have enough privileges to do so. -- Joel