From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-104065-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 24650 invoked by alias); 5 Aug 2013 19:22:24 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb-patches.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org
Received: (qmail 24641 invoked by uid 89); 5 Aug 2013 19:22:24 -0000
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_20,KHOP_THREADED,RDNS_NONE autolearn=no version=3.3.1
Received: from Unknown (HELO glazunov.sibelius.xs4all.nl) (83.163.83.176)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.84/v0.84-167-ge50287c) with ESMTP; Mon, 05 Aug 2013 19:22:24 +0000
Received: from glazunov.sibelius.xs4all.nl (kettenis@localhost [127.0.0.1])	by glazunov.sibelius.xs4all.nl (8.14.5/8.14.3) with ESMTP id r75JMDH9027439;	Mon, 5 Aug 2013 21:22:13 +0200 (CEST)
Received: (from kettenis@localhost)	by glazunov.sibelius.xs4all.nl (8.14.5/8.14.3/Submit) id r75JMD4p020143;	Mon, 5 Aug 2013 21:22:13 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Mon, 05 Aug 2013 19:22:00 -0000
Message-Id: <201308051922.r75JMD4p020143@glazunov.sibelius.xs4all.nl>
From: Mark Kettenis <mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl>
To: tromey@redhat.com
CC: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
In-reply-to: <877gg07xz4.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> (message from Tom Tromey on	Mon, 05 Aug 2013 13:13:03 -0600)
Subject: Re: [PATCH] move gdbarch object from objfile to per-BFD
References: <1375725385-11178-1-git-send-email-tromey@redhat.com>	<201308051811.r75IBJGq013284@glazunov.sibelius.xs4all.nl> <877gg07xz4.fsf@fleche.redhat.com>
X-SW-Source: 2013-08/txt/msg00159.txt.bz2

> From: Tom Tromey <tromey@redhat.com>
> Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
> 
> >>>>> "Mark" == Mark Kettenis <mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl> writes:
> 
> Mark> The pointer chasing gets a bit ridiculous though.  Perhaps it needs a
> Mark> little helper function?
> 
> I can add it.  The reason I did not is that, for whatever reason,
> objfiles have not historically used accessors.  So, I preserved the
> status quo in this respect.

Merely a suggestion.  If you considered it and decided against it
that's fine with me.