From: Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>
To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: [COMMIT PATCH] value_bits_valid: Fix latent bug.
Date: Thu, 04 Jul 2013 16:09:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130704160927.11801.10290.stgit@brno.lan> (raw)
Doing something else, I factored out the bits of the value_bits_valid
function that actually handle the check_validity hook, and
surprisingly found out that the result was misbehaving. Turns out
value_bits_valid has a latent bug. If the value is not lval_computed,
or doesn't have a check_validity hook, then we should assume the value
is entirely valid, not invalid. This is currently masked by the
value->optimized_out check -- I ran the testsuite with a gdb_assert(0)
inserted in place of that return being touched by the patch, and it
never triggers.
Tested on x86_64 Fedora 17.
gdb/
2013-07-04 Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>
* value.c (value_bits_valid): If the value is not lval_computed,
or doesn't have a check_validity hook, assume the value is entirely
valid.
---
gdb/value.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/gdb/value.c b/gdb/value.c
index ce4b13a..353f62a 100644
--- a/gdb/value.c
+++ b/gdb/value.c
@@ -1086,7 +1086,7 @@ value_bits_valid (const struct value *value, int offset, int length)
return 1;
if (value->lval != lval_computed
|| !value->location.computed.funcs->check_validity)
- return 0;
+ return 1;
return value->location.computed.funcs->check_validity (value, offset,
length);
}
next reply other threads:[~2013-07-04 16:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-07-04 16:09 Pedro Alves [this message]
2013-07-05 14:42 ` Andrew Burgess
2013-07-05 15:06 ` Pedro Alves
2013-07-05 15:20 ` Andrew Burgess
2013-07-05 18:21 ` Pedro Alves
2013-07-08 10:22 ` Andrew Burgess
2013-07-09 9:54 ` Regression for implptr.exp and pieces.exp [Re: [COMMIT PATCH] value_bits_valid: Fix latent bug.] Jan Kratochvil
2013-07-09 14:16 ` Andrew Burgess
2013-07-24 20:10 ` Jan Kratochvil
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130704160927.11801.10290.stgit@brno.lan \
--to=palves@redhat.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox