From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 29237 invoked by alias); 24 Jun 2013 15:50:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 29226 invoked by uid 89); 24 Jun 2013 15:50:44 -0000 X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-9.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_PGP_SIGNED,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_W,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_WL,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (HELO smtp.gentoo.org) (140.211.166.183) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.84/v0.84-167-ge50287c) with ESMTP; Mon, 24 Jun 2013 15:50:43 +0000 Received: from vapier.localnet (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C456F33E0B3; Mon, 24 Jun 2013 15:50:41 +0000 (UTC) From: Mike Frysinger To: lgustavo@codesourcery.com Subject: Re: [PATCH, gdbserver] Further cleanup of FDPIC/DSBT divergences Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2013 16:17:00 -0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.7 (Linux/3.8.3; KDE/4.6.5; x86_64; ; ) Cc: "'gdb-patches@sourceware.org'" , Yao Qi References: <51C34F14.8070803@codesourcery.com> In-Reply-To: <51C34F14.8070803@codesourcery.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart2223780.7g9nat0gFr"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201306241150.41599.vapier@gentoo.org> X-Virus-Found: No X-SW-Source: 2013-06/txt/msg00656.txt.bz2 --nextPart2223780.7g9nat0gFr Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-length: 487 On Thursday 20 June 2013 14:51:00 Luis Machado wrote: > What do you think? Yao? Mike? bloop, accidentally deleted this before i got a chance to respond :) this looks really good. i wondered why DSBT was written the way it was=20 (slightly different from FDPIC). the fact that it can work with the FDPIC= =20 structure is awesome. i have no opinion on the backwards compat issue, but= it=20 doesn't seem like it should be a problem as the official kernel hasn't=20 supported. -mike --nextPart2223780.7g9nat0gFr Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. Content-length: 836 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAABAgAGBQJRyGrRAAoJEEFjO5/oN/WBz7cQAJ3Ci2At8qcYSLTAe4INb011 E4m+Es3bG4OyM2bRskm0317HCpFKzGgbM/7b7iaahFQ7wBRXr2yJWe6R7ZMXuivB cDA6Z+AWTS0/9mXxYXc3cLRSvD3HKmf8LjDh7+HlBZZBbAJmKw2B3fRtJb0HjgJY i+Stws764CSSjQFLEaX2FoyTyUHJhhESyb9EghfZS4koGtJ2Jk6BegN7szcB6H/G gPRk0sqLeF9RVY5TRFkRvE3KkPafduK4JcaF2lDRQa8egTjziCHNLvpyxu7yVOgl wI+n7yW/tG/f39rvtWF0Avw0gZ5HruNuS+VYA8yOouvUu6jhfaLdefCIGEJdj1E9 3+uqu4wJ632gHo8au+bgZIJUGsqGqQNHr40sn10s6WvoXFHjatOhhwZ0obrwHzlW C74/IVujBTLP/9lGpI6LH4BVWJcqX/FDxx0Hs7TbFk/N1Ru6Qce5rY5T5KxoRbP+ IHP2ej7yYzvWpfceE6fmSTNfBPSvss1Q7PmQXuJ5mQ9oHHf/uY0eTdPXBy9f0XB4 KseIgvvMSuYFeZdMd+A4DN4rmNTrre17I6W5/B0+nGYb0k8xiW2Ml+t7KEqBHUgt XxR6jbYm9ZXfa7tbx2uD+/OT6lLHhyNR+CTaNr+0m2FqWJHecgGtc0YZXGn/F3Lm VmN/8OhSPIgpb7F7Jnzw =VIYX -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart2223780.7g9nat0gFr--