From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-102604-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 13754 invoked by alias); 19 Jun 2013 13:24:44 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb-patches.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org
Received: (qmail 13698 invoked by uid 89); 19 Jun 2013 13:24:43 -0000
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-6.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_W,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_WL,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.84/v0.84-167-ge50287c) with ESMTP; Wed, 19 Jun 2013 13:24:43 +0000
Received: from int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.22])	by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r5JDObuC016196	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK);	Wed, 19 Jun 2013 09:24:37 -0400
Received: from host2.jankratochvil.net (ovpn-116-40.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.116.40])	by int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r5JDOX1G027227	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO);	Wed, 19 Jun 2013 09:24:36 -0400
Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2013 13:25:00 -0000
From: Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil@redhat.com>
To: Joel Brobecker <brobecker@adacore.com>, Yao Qi <yao@codesourcery.com>
Cc: Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>, gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: [cancel] [patch] ChangeLog width 74 -> 80
Message-ID: <20130619132432.GA1910@host2.jankratochvil.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <51C151EF.5010209@codesourcery.com> <20130618210910.GC5560@adacore.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
X-IsSubscribed: yes
X-SW-Source: 2013-06/txt/msg00489.txt.bz2

On Tue, 18 Jun 2013 23:09:10 +0200, Joel Brobecker wrote:
> FWIW, I find 80 characters to be too long, and more difficult to read.
> I thought 74 characters was a good compromise, so why not standardize
> on that?

On Wed, 19 Jun 2013 08:38:39 +0200, Yao Qi wrote:
> Yes, we have large screen display nowadays, but a 80-character line
> is too long to read, for me.

Canceling this patch to rather keep the status quo before it has more serious
consequences than I could imagine.


Jan