From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 1158 invoked by alias); 14 Jun 2013 13:39:03 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 1113 invoked by uid 89); 14 Jun 2013 13:39:02 -0000 X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-6.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_W,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_WL,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS,TW_OC autolearn=unavailable version=3.3.1 Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.84/v0.84-167-ge50287c) with ESMTP; Fri, 14 Jun 2013 13:39:01 +0000 Received: from int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.11]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r5EDcurd019494 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Fri, 14 Jun 2013 09:38:56 -0400 Received: from host2.jankratochvil.net (ovpn-116-66.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.116.66]) by int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id r5EDcpv3000644 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Fri, 14 Jun 2013 09:38:55 -0400 Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2013 14:24:00 -0000 From: Jan Kratochvil To: Thomas Schwinge Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, gcc@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: [GCC PR55056] Re: [RFC patch] testsuite: Workaround issues with GCC 4.8.0pre + gdb.trace new KFAIL Message-ID: <20130614133849.GA12925@host2.jankratochvil.net> References: <20130126202645.GA4888@host2.jankratochvil.net> <5106D7E1.1060705@codesourcery.com> <20130129174955.GA17823@host2.jankratochvil.net> <20130202092240.GA24458@host2.jankratochvil.net> <20130203172721.GA8611@host2.jankratochvil.net> <87r4g4vo94.fsf@kepler.schwinge.homeip.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87r4g4vo94.fsf@kepler.schwinge.homeip.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2013-06/txt/msg00335.txt.bz2 On Fri, 14 Jun 2013 15:02:47 +0200, Thomas Schwinge wrote: > On Sun, 3 Feb 2013 18:27:21 +0100, Jan Kratochvil wrote: > > gdb/testsuite/ > > 2013-02-02 Jan Kratochvil > > > > Workaround GCC PR debug/55056 and GDB PR server/15081. > > * gdb.base/restore.c (caller3): Protect l1 by GCC_PR_55056 #ifdef. > > (caller4): Protect l1 and l2 by GCC_PR_55056 #ifdef. > > (caller5): Protect l1, l2 and l3 by GCC_PR_55056 #ifdef. > > * gdb.base/restore.exp: New variable opts. Test caller3, caller4 and > > caller5 for l1, l2 and l3. New prepare_for_testing. > > * gdb.base/store.c (wack_longest, wack_float, wack_double) > > (wack_doublest): Protect l and r by GCC_PR_55056 #ifdef. > > * gdb.base/store.exp: New variable opts. Test longest, float, double > > and doublest functions for l and r. New prepare_for_testing. > > * gdb.trace/collection.c (reglocal_test_func): Protect locf and locd by > > GCC_PR_55056 #ifdef. Protect locar by GDB_PR_15081 #ifdef. > > * gdb.trace/unavailable.c: Likewise. > > * gdb.trace/collection.exp: New variable opts. Test reglocal_test_func > > for locf, locd and locar. New prepare_for_testing. > > (gdb_collect_locals_test): Increase list size to 43. > > * gdb.trace/unavailable.exp: Likewise. > > As far as I can tell, no consensus has yet been reached about the > approach to fix this issue discussed in this thread. (I have not looked > at the proposed patch in detail.) I have found now I posted the testsuite workaround for GDB http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2013-01/msg00688.html but it has never been checked-in (neither in Fedora) which explains why you see PASS->FAIL (which I also see on Fedora 19). Jan