From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 17073 invoked by alias); 20 May 2013 05:40:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 17063 invoked by uid 89); 20 May 2013 05:40:31 -0000 X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_NO autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 Received: from rock.gnat.com (HELO rock.gnat.com) (205.232.38.15) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.84/v0.84-167-ge50287c) with ESMTP; Mon, 20 May 2013 05:40:31 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B1412E9E4; Mon, 20 May 2013 01:40:29 -0400 (EDT) Received: from rock.gnat.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rock.gnat.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id iDvwsCWGFzwP; Mon, 20 May 2013 01:40:29 -0400 (EDT) Received: from joel.gnat.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1CD3F2E4C1; Mon, 20 May 2013 01:40:29 -0400 (EDT) Received: by joel.gnat.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 8B83CC23BC; Mon, 20 May 2013 09:40:23 +0400 (RET) Date: Mon, 20 May 2013 05:40:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: Doug Evans Cc: Tom Tromey , gdb-patches Subject: Re: [RFA] Make cu/tu functions in dwarf.exp take a list of options Message-ID: <20130520054023.GL4017@adacore.com> References: <871u95qy90.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-SW-Source: 2013-05/txt/msg00715.txt.bz2 > When you change the calling sequence of a function in a simple fashion, > and you change all the callers of the function to use the new calling > sequence, there is no need to make individual entries for all the > callers that you changed. Just write in the entry for the function > being called, ``All callers changed''---like this: FWIW: No real opinion, but I intepreted the above in the context of the same file only. I find that listing all the files adjusted was fairly easy, so I thought the added information was worth the small effort... -- Joel