From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 8513 invoked by alias); 17 May 2013 05:14:56 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 8478 invoked by uid 89); 17 May 2013 05:14:54 -0000 X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_NO autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 Received: from rock.gnat.com (HELO rock.gnat.com) (205.232.38.15) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.84/v0.84-167-ge50287c) with ESMTP; Fri, 17 May 2013 05:14:53 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 482D42EAA6; Fri, 17 May 2013 01:14:52 -0400 (EDT) Received: from rock.gnat.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rock.gnat.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id hHGXqxqYGx0f; Fri, 17 May 2013 01:14:52 -0400 (EDT) Received: from joel.gnat.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3C352E2F3; Fri, 17 May 2013 01:14:51 -0400 (EDT) Received: by joel.gnat.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 40FE1C25F1; Fri, 17 May 2013 09:14:35 +0400 (RET) Date: Fri, 17 May 2013 05:14:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: Keith Seitz Cc: "gdb-patches@sourceware.org ml" Subject: Re: [RFA] completer test [was Re: [RFC] Cleanup for make_source_files_completion_list] Message-ID: <20130517051435.GC4017@adacore.com> References: <5191340B.60100@redhat.com> <519156F5.5090000@redhat.com> <5193C786.4000207@redhat.com> <5193E2DC.5000200@redhat.com> <51941E85.8010104@redhat.com> <20130516053008.GA5555@adacore.com> <20130516054906.GB5555@adacore.com> <5194FE2A.7000205@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5194FE2A.7000205@redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-SW-Source: 2013-05/txt/msg00663.txt.bz2 > Actually, I have a patch for this. I ran across the same thing with > Insight. This assert is being triggered by find_frame_funname, which > contains a dangling cleanup. This is in ada-lang.c in two places. > > I will be submitting as soon as I have enough coffee. For the record, I briefly looked at the patch, and I think they are different issues, so thanks for taking a look! I suspect we are going to find a large number of issues in ada-lang, simply because I never quite grasped the fact that cleanups should not be leaked under normal execution (only when an exception is raised, in which case they get automatically performed). -- Joel