From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 30211 invoked by alias); 7 May 2013 14:28:21 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 30200 invoked by uid 89); 7 May 2013 14:28:20 -0000 X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_NO autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 Received: from rock.gnat.com (HELO rock.gnat.com) (205.232.38.15) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.84/v0.84-167-ge50287c) with ESMTP; Tue, 07 May 2013 14:28:20 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B557C2EDC0; Tue, 7 May 2013 10:28:18 -0400 (EDT) Received: from rock.gnat.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rock.gnat.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id SCaL8FbC4TFU; Tue, 7 May 2013 10:28:18 -0400 (EDT) Received: from joel.gnat.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5542C2EDBE; Tue, 7 May 2013 10:28:18 -0400 (EDT) Received: by joel.gnat.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id B1B9BC2AFA; Tue, 7 May 2013 18:28:12 +0400 (RET) Date: Tue, 07 May 2013 14:28:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: Luis Machado Cc: Tom Tromey , gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [commit] reimplement AIX shared-lib support (v3) Message-ID: <20130507142812.GQ5278@adacore.com> References: <1367850045-26717-1-git-send-email-brobecker@adacore.com> <5189057B.5070909@codesourcery.com> <874neex4e2.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <51890CF4.5090709@codesourcery.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <51890CF4.5090709@codesourcery.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-SW-Source: 2013-05/txt/msg00224.txt.bz2 > >For me the function is static in solib-aix.c, so I don't get a warning. > >If that is true for you then the error seems like a compiler bug. > > That crossed my mind. I'll try a new build later with a different > compiler to see how it works. > > This is GCC 4.7.2 by the way. For the record, same for me. I just recompiled with GCC 4.7.4 on x86_64-linux. -- Joel