From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 26962 invoked by alias); 6 May 2013 10:32:16 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 26929 invoked by uid 89); 6 May 2013 10:32:11 -0000 X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_NO autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 Received: from rock.gnat.com (HELO rock.gnat.com) (205.232.38.15) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.84/v0.84-167-ge50287c) with ESMTP; Mon, 06 May 2013 10:32:11 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 913F92EA6B; Mon, 6 May 2013 06:32:09 -0400 (EDT) Received: from rock.gnat.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rock.gnat.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id uVg5yxZuCRD4; Mon, 6 May 2013 06:32:09 -0400 (EDT) Received: from joel.gnat.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F7C42E800; Mon, 6 May 2013 06:32:09 -0400 (EDT) Received: by joel.gnat.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 97F43C2588; Mon, 6 May 2013 14:32:03 +0400 (RET) Date: Mon, 06 May 2013 10:32:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: Jan Kratochvil Cc: Eli Zaretskii , gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] GDB 7.6 released! Message-ID: <20130506103203.GC5278@adacore.com> References: <83k3nptk18.fsf@gnu.org> <837gjotnc9.fsf@gnu.org> <20130428073805.GU3525@adacore.com> <20130505194406.GA15079@host2.jankratochvil.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20130505194406.GA15079@host2.jankratochvil.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-SW-Source: 2013-05/txt/msg00106.txt.bz2 > While according to the GDB rules the throw_perror_with_name function > could be removed now (merged back into perror_with_name) I do not find > it completely right, throw_perror_with_name is a logical part in the > whole error reporting set and it is only coincidence it has currently > no users. I had a feeling that we'd feel that way. No problem with that on my end. -- Joel