From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 19254 invoked by alias); 1 May 2013 05:14:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 19244 invoked by uid 89); 1 May 2013 05:14:44 -0000 X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_NO autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 Received: from rock.gnat.com (HELO rock.gnat.com) (205.232.38.15) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.84/v0.84-167-ge50287c) with ESMTP; Wed, 01 May 2013 05:14:43 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70D5A2E7FA; Wed, 1 May 2013 01:14:42 -0400 (EDT) Received: from rock.gnat.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rock.gnat.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id a78fENf3t-96; Wed, 1 May 2013 01:14:42 -0400 (EDT) Received: from joel.gnat.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 954F12E2C4; Wed, 1 May 2013 01:14:41 -0400 (EDT) Received: by joel.gnat.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id EEE14C178A; Tue, 30 Apr 2013 22:14:32 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 01 May 2013 05:14:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: Eli Zaretskii Cc: tromey@redhat.com, gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [RFA] Thread exit messages on MS-Windows Message-ID: <20130501051432.GG3525@adacore.com> References: <83obd1tyi7.fsf@gnu.org> <838v44tnf8.fsf@gnu.org> <87li817699.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <83mwshqrq8.fsf@gnu.org> <20130430072532.GZ3525@adacore.com> <83obcwoubz.fsf@gnu.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <83obcwoubz.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-SW-Source: 2013-05/txt/msg00001.txt.bz2 > > > If we decide to do this in delete_thread, then we will have to remove > > > the announcements in several target-specific files which do that, like > > > linux-nat.c. Is that OK? > > > > I would like us to go that route also, but let's do that separately? > > So you are saying I should commit my proposed patch now, and deal with > the platform-agnostic change later? I'm OK with that. That's correct. Your change is already a worthwhile improvement, and won't impair the more general adjustment for later. -- Joel