From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 4751 invoked by alias); 30 Apr 2013 07:25:41 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 4740 invoked by uid 89); 30 Apr 2013 07:25:41 -0000 X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_NO autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 Received: from rock.gnat.com (HELO rock.gnat.com) (205.232.38.15) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.84/v0.84-167-ge50287c) with ESMTP; Tue, 30 Apr 2013 07:25:41 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7238F2EC93; Tue, 30 Apr 2013 03:25:39 -0400 (EDT) Received: from rock.gnat.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rock.gnat.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id yTw1IjgCWpbW; Tue, 30 Apr 2013 03:25:39 -0400 (EDT) Received: from joel.gnat.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D62441C659E; Tue, 30 Apr 2013 03:25:38 -0400 (EDT) Received: by joel.gnat.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 2162FC2AFB; Tue, 30 Apr 2013 00:25:33 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2013 11:38:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: Eli Zaretskii Cc: Tom Tromey , gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [RFA] Thread exit messages on MS-Windows Message-ID: <20130430072532.GZ3525@adacore.com> References: <83obd1tyi7.fsf@gnu.org> <838v44tnf8.fsf@gnu.org> <87li817699.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <83mwshqrq8.fsf@gnu.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <83mwshqrq8.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-SW-Source: 2013-04/txt/msg00890.txt.bz2 > If we decide to do this in delete_thread, then we will have to remove > the announcements in several target-specific files which do that, like > linux-nat.c. Is that OK? I would like us to go that route also, but let's do that separately? When I looked at it, the announcement was almost always printed right before calling delete_thread, but not always (on some platforms, the announcement is sent while the thread is marked as "dying", and the deletion is done later on). Not sure if moving the annoucement later would make any difference in practice. -- Joel