From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 8569 invoked by alias); 9 Apr 2013 13:00:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 8558 invoked by uid 89); 9 Apr 2013 13:00:28 -0000 X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_THREADED autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 Received: from gbenson.demon.co.uk (HELO blade.wire.rat) (80.177.220.214) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.84/v0.84-167-ge50287c) with ESMTP; Tue, 09 Apr 2013 13:00:26 +0000 Received: by blade.wire.rat (Postfix, from userid 500) id 275BA263F7E; Tue, 9 Apr 2013 14:00:24 +0100 (BST) Date: Tue, 09 Apr 2013 15:29:00 -0000 From: Gary Benson To: Jan Kratochvil Cc: Aleksandar Ristovski , "gdb-patches@sourceware.org" Subject: Re: [patch 6/6] gdbserver build-id attribute generator Message-ID: <20130409130023.GC5005@blade.wire.rat> Mail-Followup-To: Jan Kratochvil , Aleksandar Ristovski , "gdb-patches@sourceware.org" References: <51530465.30503@qnx.com> <20130327145028.GA17905@host2.jankratochvil.net> <515353CF.40601@qnx.com> <5154ADD2.9040206@qnx.com> <20130331174322.GB21374@host2.jankratochvil.net> <515B05D8.1000003@qnx.com> <20130403193258.GA9853@host2.jankratochvil.net> <515ECB30.5010504@qnx.com> <20130409112930.GA5005@blade.wire.rat> <20130409114245.GA14179@host2.jankratochvil.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20130409114245.GA14179@host2.jankratochvil.net> X-SW-Source: 2013-04/txt/msg00223.txt.bz2 Jan Kratochvil wrote: > On Tue, 09 Apr 2013 13:29:31 +0200, Gary Benson wrote: > > For the record this is the only part of your patchset that clashes > > with the gdbserver work I'm doing. It's not an *awful* clash, but > > it will require a manual merge. > > It's not just about technical patch clash but rather a possible for > example runtime performance regression applying both patches > together. But I do not know your (Gary's) patch to say more. I don't envisage any performance regression but I'll obviously check. Cheers, Gary -- http://gbenson.net/