From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 28864 invoked by alias); 5 Apr 2013 19:16:04 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 28853 invoked by uid 89); 5 Apr 2013 19:16:04 -0000 X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-7.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_RCVD_UNTRUST,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_W,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.84/v0.84-167-ge50287c) with ESMTP; Fri, 05 Apr 2013 19:16:02 +0000 Received: from int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.12]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r35JFuEt019914 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Fri, 5 Apr 2013 15:15:56 -0400 Received: from host2.jankratochvil.net (ovpn-116-44.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.116.44]) by int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id r35JFprm024236 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Fri, 5 Apr 2013 15:15:53 -0400 Date: Fri, 05 Apr 2013 20:20:00 -0000 From: Jan Kratochvil To: Pedro Alves Cc: Andreas Schwab , gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: [commit+7.6] [patch 1/2+7.6] /proc/PID/smaps: filename fix Message-ID: <20130405191550.GA7550@host2.jankratochvil.net> References: <20130329195301.GA3502@host2.jankratochvil.net> <20130329202737.GA6075@host2.jankratochvil.net> <515F184F.2000003@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <515F184F.2000003@redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2013-04/txt/msg00141.txt.bz2 On Fri, 05 Apr 2013 20:30:39 +0200, Pedro Alves wrote: > The current warning doesn't actually show what failed to parse. > We'd need to print the line for that. I will post a new patch for it. > > I believe the second output was originally intended, this is what this patch > > tries to fix. > > I agree. Checked in: http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-cvs/2013-04/msg00052.html and for 7.6: http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-cvs/2013-04/msg00053.html Thanks, Jan