From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 21219 invoked by alias); 26 Mar 2013 16:21:24 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 21090 invoked by uid 89); 26 Mar 2013 16:21:16 -0000 X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-6.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (HELO smtp.gentoo.org) (140.211.166.183) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.84/v0.84-167-ge50287c) with ESMTP; Tue, 26 Mar 2013 16:21:13 +0000 Received: from vapier.localnet (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8234933D77F; Tue, 26 Mar 2013 16:21:11 +0000 (UTC) From: Mike Frysinger To: "Hans-Peter Nilsson" Subject: Re: Recent simulator patches broke many sims Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2013 17:49:00 -0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.7 (Linux/3.7.6; KDE/4.6.5; x86_64; ; ) Cc: joel.sherrill@oarcorp.com, gdb-patches@sourceware.org References: <201303242323.r2ONNS1m027200@ignucius.se.axis.com> In-Reply-To: <201303242323.r2ONNS1m027200@ignucius.se.axis.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart5047338.9XP3bhoEOd"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201303261225.40691.vapier@gentoo.org> X-Virus-Found: No X-SW-Source: 2013-03/txt/msg00970.txt.bz2 --nextPart5047338.9XP3bhoEOd Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-length: 1428 On Sunday 24 March 2013 19:23:28 Hans-Peter Nilsson wrote: > > From: Joel Sherrill > > Date: Sun, 24 Mar 2013 15:45:27 +0100 > >=20 > > This came in after I was done email last night. My test > > run finished overnight with no horribly bad issues. I have no idea > > what the make check results should be though and they could be > > because I simply ran "make check" with no board specified and > > no gcc for the target installed. >=20 > This would be no news to *you*, but for the record: >=20 > You need a board (make check RUNTESTFLAGS=3D--target_board=3D$board > with e.g. board=3Dcris-sim). All boards are in "recent" > dejagnu-1.5 IIRC and most in ancient dejagnu-1.4.4. You need > installed binutils (e.g. in some temp location added to PATH for > the duration of the test-run) for each sim configuration as > mentioned. I don't run with target gcc; not needed for the > level of smoke test I'm after and I guess not for this change > either. that's not entirely true. many (all but cris?) sims run & pass just fine=20 without needing to explicitly pass magic flags. i know the Blackfin and fr= v=20 sims can build & run pretty much all their tests w/out requiring board flag= s. imo, requiring manual board selection like this is archaic for no good reas= on.=20=20 i never test sims with specific flags, nor do i plan on starting. `make ch= eck- sim` is my limit of testing. -mike --nextPart5047338.9XP3bhoEOd Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. Content-length: 836 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAABAgAGBQJRUcwEAAoJEEFjO5/oN/WBPe4QAKPBd87kBooueQSdEe7dyCNt q/snGpWsskhKRv1SmCfNrcgBbgX3kBck3+c9howPxLvjqxOcubur+O+wbjEh7+8Q kx02UJEzaR0ctPfKdat1IwsBruhvcqxpRRUQqoA85FkGeI9Jx3+mtJC1/OGFRza7 7s1n7nZxq+slRy9dK8RtwoQWW8DCzHsf8JQ8lwW8VtECcImjPFpfKS3HMgmadPhW sCLj5HYyJsjm4KtzVn+2cOS8mPbRhsv5rNx17Hq3WMyeVgPqRQnjlmakBNKWu42+ ViVwZjZSihJ2KomCgSOIFDMcLLYVfOnYqDl7TrCblzOgnOtgiEugyxFPVx/UEbrZ G+jqeZ1WPg41YaFrjA3Uz1Bodo/IXGezN2pwlqatbMBnZheEKu9lg5+fbJCDv/ON kohX8WTZ+Nf3IemelVfjM5Gbl6mSkOe2t/S6tVR7IyShbqxlv83dnrcfsq6yaldL 4UBsb7Vgs+7kdU34UpirAdSTSxieUlRtfWMz4K+JaQJIAYN68lvqeTdIq+gsSIw9 VXIOmlaWfd6ceA/Aug1Iai8fqKFnhxi7pVVY/p1K+26LJAkzOhxDDn3I77iq5zvI 4YSYi6yCJQFdhl1R/sr3dJCDL02cLaBgeNrQiEKjqv65+W/eciFj3stfYu9mZ5qg QRGU0ciTLsE7OXeRugui =MjTR -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart5047338.9XP3bhoEOd--