From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 16372 invoked by alias); 24 Mar 2013 23:23:48 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 16338 invoked by uid 89); 24 Mar 2013 23:23:38 -0000 X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 Received: from anubis.se.axis.com (HELO anubis.se.axis.com) (195.60.68.12) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.84/v0.84-167-ge50287c) with ESMTP; Sun, 24 Mar 2013 23:23:35 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by anubis.se.axis.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5CE6519E95; Mon, 25 Mar 2013 00:23:31 +0100 (CET) Received: from anubis.se.axis.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (anubis.se.axis.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id i3Et9cJvXCSc; Mon, 25 Mar 2013 00:23:30 +0100 (CET) Received: from thoth.se.axis.com (thoth.se.axis.com [10.0.2.173]) by anubis.se.axis.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F10419E6C; Mon, 25 Mar 2013 00:23:30 +0100 (CET) Received: from ignucius.se.axis.com (ignucius.se.axis.com [10.88.21.50]) by thoth.se.axis.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42E4D34168; Mon, 25 Mar 2013 00:23:30 +0100 (CET) Received: from ignucius.se.axis.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ignucius.se.axis.com (8.12.8p1/8.12.8/Debian-2woody1) with ESMTP id r2ONNUHI027204; Mon, 25 Mar 2013 00:23:30 +0100 Received: (from hp@localhost) by ignucius.se.axis.com (8.12.8p1/8.12.8/Debian-2woody1) id r2ONNS1m027200; Mon, 25 Mar 2013 00:23:28 +0100 Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2013 03:50:00 -0000 Message-Id: <201303242323.r2ONNS1m027200@ignucius.se.axis.com> From: Hans-Peter Nilsson To: joel.sherrill@oarcorp.com CC: vapier@gentoo.org, gdb-patches@sourceware.org In-reply-to: <514F1187.8050809@oarcorp.com> (message from Joel Sherrill on Sun, 24 Mar 2013 15:45:27 +0100) Subject: Re: Recent simulator patches broke many sims MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT X-SW-Source: 2013-03/txt/msg00903.txt.bz2 > From: Joel Sherrill > Date: Sun, 24 Mar 2013 15:45:27 +0100 > This came in after I was done email last night. My test > run finished overnight with no horribly bad issues. I have no idea > what the make check results should be though and they could be > because I simply ran "make check" with no board specified and > no gcc for the target installed. This would be no news to *you*, but for the record: You need a board (make check RUNTESTFLAGS=--target_board=$board with e.g. board=cris-sim). All boards are in "recent" dejagnu-1.5 IIRC and most in ancient dejagnu-1.4.4. You need installed binutils (e.g. in some temp location added to PATH for the duration of the test-run) for each sim configuration as mentioned. I don't run with target gcc; not needed for the level of smoke test I'm after and I guess not for this change either. > There were some unexpected failures but I don't know what "truth" > on that is. The truth is in the baseline. > I have saved logs from the test run and will do so with > the run on Mike's patch. > > Starting another test run with Mike's patch. > > I can put both sets of logs on an ftp server if someone wants to review > them. Guidance on what is a bad number of "unexpected failures" on > a target is appreciated. You compare against a baseline you create without your patches; comparing old/new build logs should be sufficient. Having said all that, I think just a successful *build* of each sim would be sufficient here, if your grep can find no sockser-specific tests in the target sim test-suites. brgds, H-P