From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 21872 invoked by alias); 8 Mar 2013 15:42:56 -0000 Received: (qmail 21759 invoked by uid 22791); 8 Mar 2013 15:42:54 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_RCVD_UNTRUST,KHOP_SPAMHAUS_DROP,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_W,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 08 Mar 2013 15:42:43 +0000 Received: from int-mx12.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx12.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.25]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r28FgfXt019419 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Fri, 8 Mar 2013 10:42:41 -0500 Received: from host2.jankratochvil.net (ovpn-116-31.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.116.31]) by int-mx12.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r28FgbFs030240 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Fri, 8 Mar 2013 10:42:40 -0500 Date: Fri, 08 Mar 2013 15:42:00 -0000 From: Jan Kratochvil To: "Metzger, Markus T" Cc: "markus.t.metzger@gmail.com" , "gdb-patches@sourceware.org" Subject: Re: [patch v10 00/21] branch tracing for Atom Message-ID: <20130308154237.GA8844@host2.jankratochvil.net> References: <1362734168-1725-1-git-send-email-markus.t.metzger@intel.com> <20130308135937.GB15284@host2.jankratochvil.net> <20130308145808.GA22457@host2.jankratochvil.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2013-03/txt/msg00379.txt.bz2 On Fri, 08 Mar 2013 16:13:36 +0100, Metzger, Markus T wrote: > I checked that each patch builds, but I have not run any tests for each patch. > > I am currently running the full test suite before and after the series. Do you > typically expect people to do this for each test in a series? It is useful to do it when you do some modifications of existing code. But this patchset is mostly just about adding new features and test for that is added as the last patch so I do not expect regressions in between. So I do ask for testing each of the patches. > Btw, I noticed a broken build for --enable-targets=all. I'm currently only building > for the target I'm testing. Thanks, going to check it (I do not have/run the nightly testing these days (nights)). Jan