From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 2118 invoked by alias); 6 Mar 2013 13:35:08 -0000 Received: (qmail 2035 invoked by uid 22791); 6 Mar 2013 13:35:07 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_RCVD_UNTRUST,KHOP_SPAMHAUS_DROP,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_W,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 06 Mar 2013 13:34:58 +0000 Received: from int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.11]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r26DYuiT001629 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Wed, 6 Mar 2013 08:34:56 -0500 Received: from host2.jankratochvil.net (ovpn-116-50.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.116.50]) by int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id r26DYmB0002359 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Wed, 6 Mar 2013 08:34:55 -0500 Date: Wed, 06 Mar 2013 13:35:00 -0000 From: Jan Kratochvil To: "Metzger, Markus T" Cc: "gdb-patches@sourceware.org" , "markus.t.metzger@gmail.com" Subject: Re: [patch v9 19/23] record, btrace: add record-btrace target Message-ID: <20130306133448.GA5021@host2.jankratochvil.net> References: <1362416770-19750-1-git-send-email-markus.t.metzger@intel.com> <1362416770-19750-20-git-send-email-markus.t.metzger@intel.com> <20130305201300.GS2386@host2.jankratochvil.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2013-03/txt/msg00214.txt.bz2 On Wed, 06 Mar 2013 10:57:20 +0100, Metzger, Markus T wrote: > > > + /* Print the function index. */ > > > + ui_out_field_uint (uiout, "index", idx); > > > + ui_out_text (uiout, "\t "); > > > > Why here > > So the other functions only print one of the fields and leave the > formatting to this function. I was pointing out why there is ui_out_text (uiout, "\t "); and not ui_out_text (uiout, "\t"); . I do not much understand your reply. But it sure does not matter much. Thanks, Jan