From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-99133-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 12984 invoked by alias); 6 Mar 2013 12:17:44 -0000
Received: (qmail 12962 invoked by uid 22791); 6 Mar 2013 12:17:41 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.5 required=5.0	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_RCVD_UNTRUST,KHOP_SPAMHAUS_DROP,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_W,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 06 Mar 2013 12:17:36 +0000
Received: from int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.11])	by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r26CHYgZ025300	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK);	Wed, 6 Mar 2013 07:17:34 -0500
Received: from host2.jankratochvil.net (ovpn-116-50.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.116.50])	by int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id r26CHUPa003778	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO);	Wed, 6 Mar 2013 07:17:33 -0500
Date: Wed, 06 Mar 2013 12:17:00 -0000
From: Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil@redhat.com>
To: "Metzger, Markus T" <markus.t.metzger@intel.com>
Cc: "gdb-patches@sourceware.org" <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>,        "markus.t.metzger@gmail.com" <markus.t.metzger@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [patch v9 06/23] btrace, doc: document remote serial protocol
Message-ID: <20130306121730.GA30464@host2.jankratochvil.net>
References: <1362416770-19750-1-git-send-email-markus.t.metzger@intel.com> <1362416770-19750-7-git-send-email-markus.t.metzger@intel.com> <20130305200809.GF2386@host2.jankratochvil.net> <A78C989F6D9628469189715575E55B2307B9B03B@IRSMSX102.ger.corp.intel.com> <20130306095024.GA8387@host2.jankratochvil.net> <A78C989F6D9628469189715575E55B2307B9B11B@IRSMSX102.ger.corp.intel.com> <20130306120737.GA28588@host2.jankratochvil.net> <A78C989F6D9628469189715575E55B2307B9B21C@IRSMSX102.ger.corp.intel.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <A78C989F6D9628469189715575E55B2307B9B21C@IRSMSX102.ger.corp.intel.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb-patches.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2013-03/txt/msg00209.txt.bz2

On Wed, 06 Mar 2013 13:11:25 +0100, Metzger, Markus T wrote:
> Regarding PRs, is it OK to log a PR for the recursive function known fail before
> the series has actually been committed?

In general BZ is very free, one could even file it for an unreviewed patch and
later just close the PR if it gets resolved some other way etc.

And yes, otherwise apparently you cannot check in the filed PR number...


Thanks,
Jan