From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 6625 invoked by alias); 6 Mar 2013 12:07:51 -0000 Received: (qmail 6615 invoked by uid 22791); 6 Mar 2013 12:07:50 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_RCVD_UNTRUST,KHOP_SPAMHAUS_DROP,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_W,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 06 Mar 2013 12:07:45 +0000 Received: from int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.11]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r26C7gTc022675 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Wed, 6 Mar 2013 07:07:42 -0500 Received: from host2.jankratochvil.net (ovpn-116-50.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.116.50]) by int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id r26C7b5e000428 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Wed, 6 Mar 2013 07:07:40 -0500 Date: Wed, 06 Mar 2013 12:07:00 -0000 From: Jan Kratochvil To: "Metzger, Markus T" Cc: "gdb-patches@sourceware.org" , "markus.t.metzger@gmail.com" , Eli Zaretskii , "Pedro Alves (palves@redhat.com)" Subject: Re: [patch v9 06/23] btrace, doc: document remote serial protocol Message-ID: <20130306120737.GA28588@host2.jankratochvil.net> References: <1362416770-19750-1-git-send-email-markus.t.metzger@intel.com> <1362416770-19750-7-git-send-email-markus.t.metzger@intel.com> <20130305200809.GF2386@host2.jankratochvil.net> <20130306095024.GA8387@host2.jankratochvil.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2013-03/txt/msg00207.txt.bz2 On Wed, 06 Mar 2013 11:01:29 +0100, Metzger, Markus T wrote: > I intended to commit the patches separately. There is a single patch that does not > build - the one where we split record.c. > > I could also squash the entire series, if that's preferred, but the resulting patch > will be huge. As long as each commit is buildable and not regressing (and not introducing unapproved code/functionality which just gets deleted by a later patch) it is preferred to check it in separately. (Reason: For example if one git bisect-s a regression it is easier to investigate a smaller commit.) Thanks, Jan