From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 28989 invoked by alias); 1 Mar 2013 16:41:03 -0000 Received: (qmail 28742 invoked by uid 22791); 1 Mar 2013 16:41:00 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_RCVD_UNTRUST,KHOP_SPAMHAUS_DROP,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_W,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 01 Mar 2013 16:40:50 +0000 Received: from int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.22]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r21Gem5N030224 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Fri, 1 Mar 2013 11:40:48 -0500 Received: from host2.jankratochvil.net (ovpn-116-19.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.116.19]) by int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r21GeipB028082 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Fri, 1 Mar 2013 11:40:47 -0500 Date: Fri, 01 Mar 2013 16:41:00 -0000 From: Jan Kratochvil To: Tom Tromey Cc: Pedro Alves , Yao Qi , gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [patch] gdb/CONTRIBUTE update Message-ID: <20130301164043.GA10424@host2.jankratochvil.net> References: <20130221202629.GA30015@host2.jankratochvil.net> <512C80DA.5070600@codesourcery.com> <20130226093829.GA5802@host2.jankratochvil.net> <512C9996.6000007@redhat.com> <20130226131213.GA15184@host2.jankratochvil.net> <87k3psw6x0.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <20130228212725.GA1848@host2.jankratochvil.net> <87k3prulus.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87k3prulus.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2013-03/txt/msg00028.txt.bz2 On Fri, 01 Mar 2013 17:27:07 +0100, Tom Tromey wrote: > I was thinking of automated pings. Ideally there's really no need for > pings if the list of unreviewed patches is maintained by a tool rather > than by each of us in our own inbox -- but a weekly automated report or > something wouldn't hurt. That is the whole problem - how to keep the list of pending patches. I maintain a list of my own patches I submitted. Another problem is that older patches sometimes even reviewed no longer get a response by their submitter so there should be also some response timeouts. Jan