Re: [patch] gdb/CONTRIBUTE update

Yao Qi
2013-02-26T09:52:01Z

On 02/26/2013 05:38 PM, Jan Kratochvil wrote:
> This even is not an idea of mine, it was concluded on some GNU Tools Cauldron.
>

If you meant Cauldron last year, I can't recall any discussions on this.

> I do not speak here whether the patch itself should be included in the PING
> mail again or not, I do not find that important and it is also not expressed
> explicitly in the proposed paragraph above.

OK. The subject is prefixed with "PING". What should we put in the
body of the mail? The url of the mail archive or something else?

--
Yao (é½å°§)