From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 16778 invoked by alias); 15 Feb 2013 19:10:27 -0000 Received: (qmail 16759 invoked by uid 22791); 15 Feb 2013 19:10:26 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_RCVD_UNTRUST,KHOP_SPAMHAUS_DROP,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_W,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 15 Feb 2013 19:10:13 +0000 Received: from int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.12]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r1FJA07M007620 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Fri, 15 Feb 2013 14:10:00 -0500 Received: from host2.jankratochvil.net (ovpn-116-18.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.116.18]) by int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id r1FJ9u20022400 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Fri, 15 Feb 2013 14:09:58 -0500 Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2013 19:10:00 -0000 From: Jan Kratochvil To: Eli Zaretskii Cc: markus.t.metzger@intel.com, gdb-patches@sourceware.org, markus.t.metzger@gmail.com Subject: Re: [rfc 6/8] record disas: omit function names by default Message-ID: <20130215190955.GA18269@host2.jankratochvil.net> References: <1360859352-30399-1-git-send-email-markus.t.metzger@intel.com> <1360859352-30399-7-git-send-email-markus.t.metzger@intel.com> <20130215161049.GA6219@host2.jankratochvil.net> <831uchtp4y.fsf@gnu.org> <20130215183256.GA16845@host2.jankratochvil.net> <83sj4xs8hp.fsf@gnu.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <83sj4xs8hp.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2013-02/txt/msg00410.txt.bz2 On Fri, 15 Feb 2013 20:05:38 +0100, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > It is a "backtrace" into history, not into upper frames. > > (gdb) record backtrace > > _IO_vsnprintf > > _IO_vfprintf_internal > > strchrnul > > _IO_vfprintf_internal > > __GI__IO_default_xsputn > > You can see _IO_vfprintf_internal called strchrnul which then returned back to > > _IO_vfprintf_internal. This is not a real "backtrace". > > > > I was already considering renaming the command as the term is a bit overloaded > > in the debugger context. > > > > Maybe "record list-functions"? > > How about "record trace-functions"? "trace-functions" is fine with me; we'll see what Markus says. Thanks, Jan