From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 10288 invoked by alias); 14 Feb 2013 18:54:24 -0000 Received: (qmail 10277 invoked by uid 22791); 14 Feb 2013 18:54:23 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_NO X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from rock.gnat.com (HELO rock.gnat.com) (205.232.38.15) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 14 Feb 2013 18:54:16 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F21C22E8E1; Thu, 14 Feb 2013 13:54:15 -0500 (EST) Received: from rock.gnat.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rock.gnat.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id KkmWYE6fjDMH; Thu, 14 Feb 2013 13:54:15 -0500 (EST) Received: from joel.gnat.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C31122E0FF; Thu, 14 Feb 2013 13:54:15 -0500 (EST) Received: by joel.gnat.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 1121DC162B; Thu, 14 Feb 2013 10:54:14 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2013 18:54:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: Pedro Alves Cc: Tom Tromey , gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [COMMIT PATCH 2/2] Move savestring to common/common-utils.c, make gdbserver use it. Message-ID: <20130214185413.GJ17107@adacore.com> References: <20130214171404.2223.83713.stgit@brno.lan> <20130214171411.2223.32326.stgit@brno.lan> <87r4kiixbe.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <511D2805.9050606@redhat.com> <87mwv6ix72.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <511D2980.10703@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <511D2980.10703@redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2013-02/txt/msg00373.txt.bz2 > Yeah... It'd be an easier sell if libiberty wasn't such a > kitchen sink. I know that parts of libiberty would be problematic > for the Windows CE (I know, it's rotten by now), not sure about > other ports. Lynx178 might also be an issue. Agreed on all other counts. I was hoping that gnulib would be our saviour, but maybe it does not implement everything we need (yet?). -- Joel