From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-98492-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 11124 invoked by alias); 14 Feb 2013 11:27:02 -0000
Received: (qmail 11081 invoked by uid 22791); 14 Feb 2013 11:27:02 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=5.0	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_THREADED,RP_MATCHES_RCVD
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from sibelius.xs4all.nl (HELO glazunov.sibelius.xs4all.nl) (83.163.83.176)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 14 Feb 2013 11:26:57 +0000
Received: from glazunov.sibelius.xs4all.nl (kettenis@localhost [127.0.0.1])	by glazunov.sibelius.xs4all.nl (8.14.5/8.14.3) with ESMTP id r1EBQrYU026710;	Thu, 14 Feb 2013 12:26:53 +0100 (CET)
Received: (from kettenis@localhost)	by glazunov.sibelius.xs4all.nl (8.14.5/8.14.3/Submit) id r1EBQrDm007606;	Thu, 14 Feb 2013 12:26:53 +0100 (CET)
Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2013 11:27:00 -0000
Message-Id: <201302141126.r1EBQrDm007606@glazunov.sibelius.xs4all.nl>
From: Mark Kettenis <mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl>
To: pierre.muller@ics-cnrs.unistra.fr
CC: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
In-reply-to: <000301ce0a99$f17761d0$d4662570$@muller@ics-cnrs.unistra.fr>	(pierre.muller@ics-cnrs.unistra.fr)
Subject: Re: New ARI warning Thu Feb 14 01:59:49 UTC 2013 in -D 2013-02-14-gmt
References: <20130214015949.GA27541@sourceware.org> <000301ce0a99$f17761d0$d4662570$@muller@ics-cnrs.unistra.fr>
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb-patches.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2013-02/txt/msg00342.txt.bz2

> From: "Pierre Muller" <pierre.muller@ics-cnrs.unistra.fr>
> Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2013 10:59:13 +0100
> 
> But  the discussion about removing the 'Linux comment' rule
> altogether didn't really come to a definitive conclusion....

I'm in favour.  Those who care can still "fix" these issues, but
having the ARI check things in comments just doesn't make sense.