From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 18036 invoked by alias); 7 Feb 2013 17:03:57 -0000 Received: (qmail 17978 invoked by uid 22791); 7 Feb 2013 17:03:53 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KAM_STOCKGEN,KHOP_RCVD_UNTRUST,KHOP_SPAMHAUS_DROP,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_W,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 07 Feb 2013 17:03:47 +0000 Received: from int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.24]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r17H3k0N030329 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Thu, 7 Feb 2013 12:03:46 -0500 Received: from host2.jankratochvil.net (ovpn-116-18.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.116.18]) by int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r17H3g4f025087 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Thu, 7 Feb 2013 12:03:45 -0500 Date: Thu, 07 Feb 2013 17:03:00 -0000 From: Jan Kratochvil To: Tom Tromey Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [3/3] unconditionally call via SYMBOL_COMPUTED_OPS Message-ID: <20130207170342.GC15297@host2.jankratochvil.net> References: <871udlhzzb.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <20130207163233.GA15297@host2.jankratochvil.net> <87a9rgvzg7.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87a9rgvzg7.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2013-02/txt/msg00185.txt.bz2 On Thu, 07 Feb 2013 17:52:24 +0100, Tom Tromey wrote: > If you're against the full virtualization plan, it would be nice to know now. I am not but I cannot imagine how huge such patch would be. > IIUC this was the original point of all those FIXME comments. But if > nobody wants it, we can just drop them directly. Unless you want to do the full virtualization for the virtualization itself I am OK with just fully documenting the issue at struct symbol instead of the scattered FIXME comments. I find such current fields override fits fine into the "code clarity" level GDB currently has. Thanks, Jan