From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 6488 invoked by alias); 11 Jan 2013 15:22:13 -0000 Received: (qmail 6474 invoked by uid 22791); 11 Jan 2013 15:22:12 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_RCVD_UNTRUST,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_W,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 11 Jan 2013 15:22:00 +0000 Received: from int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.23]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r0BFLug2018434 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Fri, 11 Jan 2013 10:21:56 -0500 Received: from host2.jankratochvil.net (ovpn-116-19.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.116.19]) by int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r0BFLqNs017331 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Fri, 11 Jan 2013 10:21:54 -0500 Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2013 15:22:00 -0000 From: Jan Kratochvil To: Yao Qi Cc: Tom Tromey , Joel Brobecker , gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: [obv] Fix new FAIL on 64-bit targets [Re: [PATCH 1/3] Test of breakpoint output for dprintf] Message-ID: <20130111152151.GA15138@host2.jankratochvil.net> References: <1355285581-28889-1-git-send-email-yao@codesourcery.com> <1355285581-28889-2-git-send-email-yao@codesourcery.com> <87vcb6w0v7.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <20130110054342.GI6143@adacore.com> <50EED5CD.9020802@codesourcery.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <50EED5CD.9020802@codesourcery.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2013-01/txt/msg00228.txt.bz2 On Thu, 10 Jan 2013 15:53:01 +0100, Yao Qi wrote: > * gdb.base/dprintf.exp: Check the output of 'info breakpoints' > for dprintf. > * gdb.mi/mi-breakpoint-changed.exp (test_insert_delete_modify): > Check the fields in "=breakpoint-created" for dprintf. It has FAIL on 64-bit targets: gdb_expect_list pattern: /[^M ]Num Type Disp Enb Address What/ info breakpoints^M Num Type Disp Enb Address What^M 2 breakpoint keep y 0x0000000000400743 in main at ./gdb.base/dprintf.c:33^M [...] (gdb) FAIL: gdb.base/dprintf.exp: dprintf info 1 (pattern 1) Checked in as obvious. Thanks, Jan http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-cvs/2013-01/msg00059.html --- src/gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog 2013/01/11 00:31:56 1.3500 +++ src/gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog 2013/01/11 15:21:13 1.3501 @@ -1,3 +1,8 @@ +2013-01-11 Jan Kratochvil + + * gdb.base/dprintf.exp (dprintf info 1): Fix expectation on 64-bit + targets. + 2013-01-11 Yao Qi * gdb.base/dprintf.exp: Check the output of 'info breakpoints' --- src/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/dprintf.exp 2013/01/11 00:31:58 1.7 +++ src/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/dprintf.exp 2013/01/11 15:21:14 1.8 @@ -44,7 +44,7 @@ "Dprintf .*" gdb_test_sequence "info breakpoints" "dprintf info 1" { - "\[\r\n\]Num Type Disp Enb Address What" + "\[\r\n\]Num Type Disp Enb Address +What" "\[\r\n\]2 breakpoint" "\[\r\n\]3 dprintf" "\[\r\n\] printf \"At foo entry\\\\n\""