From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 5160 invoked by alias); 24 Dec 2012 03:49:33 -0000 Received: (qmail 5150 invoked by uid 22791); 24 Dec 2012 03:49:32 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_PGP_SIGNED,KHOP_RCVD_UNTRUST,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_W,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (HELO smtp.gentoo.org) (140.211.166.183) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 24 Dec 2012 03:49:20 +0000 Received: from vapier.localnet (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD94E33DA01; Mon, 24 Dec 2012 03:49:19 +0000 (UTC) From: Mike Frysinger To: Joel Brobecker Subject: Re: Update some sim copyright headers to GPLv3-or-later Date: Mon, 24 Dec 2012 03:49:00 -0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.7 (Linux/3.7.1; KDE/4.6.5; x86_64; ; ) Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, Ralf Corsepius References: <20121219072641.GQ3273@adacore.com> <201212211356.59716.vapier@gentoo.org> <20121222044329.GJ5370@adacore.com> In-Reply-To: <20121222044329.GJ5370@adacore.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart1434280.b31HlFObIm"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201212232249.50527.vapier@gentoo.org> X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-12/txt/msg00797.txt.bz2 --nextPart1434280.b31HlFObIm Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-length: 765 On Friday 21 December 2012 23:43:29 Joel Brobecker wrote: > > this is common behavior when using aclocal. but the sourceware tree > > does try to be a bit more "stand alone" when it comes to 3rd party > > dependencies. i think the Blackfin sim subdir is treading somewhat > > new water here. > >=20 > > maybe the answer is to copy pkg.m4 from the latest pkg-config release > > into the top level config/ dir ? >=20 > This is indeed what Ralf suggested privately. I think it would be > helpful doing that - it guaranties that we can reproduce the same > result as anyone else (shielding us from variations in pkg-config, > for instance). i think i fudged the cc, but i posted a patch to the gcc list: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2012-12/msg01380.html -mike --nextPart1434280.b31HlFObIm Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. Content-length: 836 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAABAgAGBQJQ19DeAAoJEEFjO5/oN/WBi/8QAMowPzXb6VyWdR4vfJAEUyoF aGcObUx/O7ETpTnLBXAIrCszqKUI/Kn1k9b5LZ6hOvRfdY4fNfR6itVvUSyeKXeI vz7zQWA+FnT3n8Yj6hPeQG6Km+newFRaUVJT5qgnMVuptbVngiyCo+wQbUKuSL9k hrkynC+DDcyRXlGj0VDdA+gQqw3LuPy+VgHpM7KNcPTbUw2UfN5s7jnl5KktPxiz y3m3n3mn3lx+C8ehXDniiGT+FeTG4W8zIxCNgF5KJtRkNQzg5mQWoI1fIWxlqjiN 5j53q4fmoA29ufcAUZFv/E4dHgFuQH0ZhyIpDkNuQVRWuuKiosG/JABXDmyMfHvy f4DRyviHT7TbDTdgdwzdWaROROyleI0WhvMI1B6CxE2PaCLOb+g6B86XHRwS/ur5 K5w9uf06lae4LwOJMpIPD/lFHpqAp9QanBcojkIsOlBSHg84OdC2bRgKYKhRKJTU md9fXCeUmyLHqmgLdeG/aqyr5mVMRnAOnEz0FFarIpD13TNmxle9R2l2Hh1FEB74 RtiUY4TkQ+NdVn7bptQD94LeKMaAye8xmFREG3QoaX66RgwHEQj4/4xYr0JiT7bZ h8rqyiGbq8TWVr9+2Vc1ZNp4gEWlgK9AyuLI9CyiANO0pspEfri83Oqj/IvyxfzA x+gV/hIVkng7qXMxoOG8 =ARn7 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1434280.b31HlFObIm--