From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 15555 invoked by alias); 21 Dec 2012 07:44:25 -0000 Received: (qmail 15545 invoked by uid 22791); 21 Dec 2012 07:44:24 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_NO X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from rock.gnat.com (HELO rock.gnat.com) (205.232.38.15) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 21 Dec 2012 07:44:16 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C76F32E123; Fri, 21 Dec 2012 02:44:15 -0500 (EST) Received: from rock.gnat.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rock.gnat.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 8+c0HxLeI1Pg; Fri, 21 Dec 2012 02:44:15 -0500 (EST) Received: from joel.gnat.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5324B2E10F; Fri, 21 Dec 2012 02:44:15 -0500 (EST) Received: by joel.gnat.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id D8F31C3903; Fri, 21 Dec 2012 11:44:07 +0400 (RET) Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2012 07:44:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: Mike Frysinger Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: Update some sim copyright headers to GPLv3-or-later Message-ID: <20121221074407.GD5370@adacore.com> References: <20121219072641.GQ3273@adacore.com> <201212192334.22589.vapier@gentoo.org> <20121220050320.GE6130@adacore.com> <201212201735.40797.vapier@gentoo.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <201212201735.40797.vapier@gentoo.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-12/txt/msg00760.txt.bz2 > > I ran aclocal myself, and it blew away more than just my change, > > but the entire block of code. Does it mean that only you are able > > to regenerate this file properly? > > do you have pkg-config installed ? you'd need that (since it provides > pkg.m4) in order for `aclocal` to work in the bfin subdir. I do seem to have pkg-config installed: % which pkg-config /usr/bin/pkg-config % pkg-config --version 0.26 Is that the same tool we are talking about? pkg-config, I thought, was a tool initially from the Gtk+ project. I would seem strange that aclocal would depend on it. Is there a special command to run for it to work? I used the exact same aclocal version, compiled from sources and without modification, and I still see that pkg.m4 disappears... Thanks, -- Joel