From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 29876 invoked by alias); 20 Dec 2012 22:35:39 -0000 Received: (qmail 29793 invoked by uid 22791); 20 Dec 2012 22:35:38 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_PGP_SIGNED,KHOP_RCVD_UNTRUST,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_W,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (HELO smtp.gentoo.org) (140.211.166.183) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 20 Dec 2012 22:35:34 +0000 Received: from vapier.localnet (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C256033D8DC; Thu, 20 Dec 2012 22:35:33 +0000 (UTC) From: Mike Frysinger To: Joel Brobecker Subject: Re: Update some sim copyright headers to GPLv3-or-later Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2012 22:35:00 -0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.7 (Linux/3.7.1; KDE/4.6.5; x86_64; ; ) Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org References: <20121219072641.GQ3273@adacore.com> <201212192334.22589.vapier@gentoo.org> <20121220050320.GE6130@adacore.com> In-Reply-To: <20121220050320.GE6130@adacore.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart2416483.I6yM5qVvH4"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201212201735.40797.vapier@gentoo.org> X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-12/txt/msg00757.txt.bz2 --nextPart2416483.I6yM5qVvH4 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-length: 1047 On Thursday 20 December 2012 00:03:21 Joel Brobecker wrote: > > what i mean is worrying about the flow of code. if they aren't both > > GPLv2 based, i now have to worry about people being able to make the > > claim that i'm committing GPLv3 sim code to the GPLv2 kernel and > > tainting it. considering the code in question, doing GPLv3 on it will > > gain nothing. >=20 > I have relayed the above to the FSF. thanks > > > I don't understand exactly the status of this file. Can I just > > > regenerate the "reverted" version and the project will still work? > >=20 > > next time someone runs `aclocal` (like me), it'll blow away your > > changes as it copies m4 macros from files in /usr/share/ and into the > > aclocal.m4. >=20 > I ran aclocal myself, and it blew away more than just my change, > but the entire block of code. Does it mean that only you are able > to regenerate this file properly? do you have pkg-config installed ? you'd need that (since it provides pkg.= m4)=20 in order for `aclocal` to work in the bfin subdir. -mike --nextPart2416483.I6yM5qVvH4 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. Content-length: 836 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAABAgAGBQJQ05K8AAoJEEFjO5/oN/WBaaUP/0IJ7nELpCMLS9Yzi64QnwGB q9vM/omuovPjPMV03XcyEfO3pZWElEgSv/Q4DI0CtRks4Rs6UlGMVlV9IF454v49 /CEXYiD+bk93E3sj2WZnDoS1JN1Wx4yTuY+RbmrWYit9HQx/XQP7cWB+R1LtOS5q ZyT9u+kTh1ZYEsWt18ECH1WTKqcxnW4c59I0fRS0oVxsqpz33ShQ5e8QPKaGlJbg MWi/xImINY66R+ahfi/pXDqUHi39uG8sCRxSp3OBvtMblYOQNPEG6QsjsJLV8B42 4DeDqHkwXOUxWiXRfrQKgkUetzgmIb8XrCkZ1kTpXguP2i9l/BDSGjMpy03YrOPw MgdqHIYKgjAkb/rdrPGbS9K7gkFm+ecVAFI4Rx/f4PIhTqJGWJJou1Zby/38K+BP YF03UuhYaHSzJc+tEICQpqZRV4enQdt5hUF84KgZIvonGyFzqDqfcOzaZ7Z+4PVi 2zJAF3j4TZO4ZGFwJD5xVH4bBs4fDDCo3DJxRAb2Ry8gmUq+eaQVfP9DLnYygltg pKChfB64q8VDfIdUjgZMQezxsq7OCzbFqgJu0cmWX/FeIFY52a2rhUIk+SXjr8HV cJLR1Thr7FxPYxFP2MhBmxzVqVDqrdbSIO78q58ZbpmU+XuEvshwGwIfQj64tl0S SUGXBhH2Wolru2kqexBg =dxZm -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart2416483.I6yM5qVvH4--