From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 30855 invoked by alias); 19 Dec 2012 09:05:19 -0000 Received: (qmail 30840 invoked by uid 22791); 19 Dec 2012 09:05:18 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_NO X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from rock.gnat.com (HELO rock.gnat.com) (205.232.38.15) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 19 Dec 2012 09:05:12 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8CE932E4AE; Wed, 19 Dec 2012 04:05:11 -0500 (EST) Received: from rock.gnat.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rock.gnat.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id TmeOXOMkwU2A; Wed, 19 Dec 2012 04:05:11 -0500 (EST) Received: from joel.gnat.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25CDF2E4B1; Wed, 19 Dec 2012 04:05:11 -0500 (EST) Received: by joel.gnat.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 1AE68C3948; Wed, 19 Dec 2012 13:04:58 +0400 (RET) Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2012 09:05:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: Mark Kettenis Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: Update some sim copyright headers to GPLv3-or-later Message-ID: <20121219090457.GT3273@adacore.com> References: <20121219072641.GQ3273@adacore.com> <201212190850.qBJ8oiUb030909@glazunov.sibelius.xs4all.nl> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <201212190850.qBJ8oiUb030909@glazunov.sibelius.xs4all.nl> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-12/txt/msg00684.txt.bz2 > > As per a request from the FSF, I have updated the copyright headers > > of the non-FSF-copyrighted files from "GPL v2 or later" to "GPL v3 > > or later". > > You can't do this without asking the copyright holders for permission first. I was told the contrary by Karl Berry, and asked to change. IANAL, but the "or (at your option) any later version" should give us the right to do so, right? -- Joel