From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 930 invoked by alias); 18 Dec 2012 16:57:56 -0000 Received: (qmail 917 invoked by uid 22791); 18 Dec 2012 16:57:53 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_NO X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from rock.gnat.com (HELO rock.gnat.com) (205.232.38.15) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 18 Dec 2012 16:57:18 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B0DAF2E45C; Tue, 18 Dec 2012 11:57:17 -0500 (EST) Received: from rock.gnat.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rock.gnat.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 9WsP72KMTeyO; Tue, 18 Dec 2012 11:57:17 -0500 (EST) Received: from joel.gnat.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47A022E051; Tue, 18 Dec 2012 11:57:17 -0500 (EST) Received: by joel.gnat.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id A5FEBC394A; Tue, 18 Dec 2012 20:57:06 +0400 (RET) Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2012 16:57:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: Jan Kratochvil Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [RFC] Add system-gdbinit infrastructure Message-ID: <20121218165706.GK3273@adacore.com> References: <1355846036-7645-1-git-send-email-brobecker@adacore.com> <20121218164741.GB23234@host2.jankratochvil.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20121218164741.GB23234@host2.jankratochvil.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-12/txt/msg00647.txt.bz2 > But I do not see this problem solved in your patch, how do you execute > those files? My patch does not address the problem you point out. This is an orthogonal issue, IMO. > Besides that I find such files more as configuration files where read-only > $(GDB_DATADIR) is not a suitable location. Can you explain why not? As I said, for some systems, it works universally, so sharing them across users in the read-only GDB_DATADIR seems fine to me. -- Joel