From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 24517 invoked by alias); 11 Dec 2012 13:12:50 -0000 Received: (qmail 24418 invoked by uid 22791); 11 Dec 2012 13:12:49 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_NO X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from rock.gnat.com (HELO rock.gnat.com) (205.232.38.15) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 11 Dec 2012 13:12:44 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F5122E2F9; Tue, 11 Dec 2012 08:12:44 -0500 (EST) Received: from rock.gnat.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rock.gnat.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 4TrLsrlsB7hX; Tue, 11 Dec 2012 08:12:44 -0500 (EST) Received: from joel.gnat.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E01472E147; Tue, 11 Dec 2012 08:12:43 -0500 (EST) Received: by joel.gnat.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id B17FBC3B05; Tue, 11 Dec 2012 17:12:22 +0400 (RET) Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2012 13:12:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: Pierre Muller Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: New ARI warning Fri Nov 16 01:56:44 UTC 2012 Message-ID: <20121211131222.GP31477@adacore.com> References: <20121116015644.GA22323@sourceware.org> <20121116021950.GH3790@adacore.com> <000001cdc3de$d649cfd0$82dd6f70$@muller@ics-cnrs.unistra.fr> <20121119222710.GC9964@adacore.com> <001801cdd7a0$369d7380$a3d85a80$@muller@ics-cnrs.unistra.fr> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <001801cdd7a0$369d7380$a3d85a80$@muller@ics-cnrs.unistra.fr> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-12/txt/msg00322.txt.bz2 > Hi Joel, > now that 7.5.1 is out, > could I insert contrib/ari into branch? Yes, of course, please go ahead. I assume that you know that there will likely not be another release off that branch - so it must be for technical convenience, is that rigth? > What about the rule of adding something to NEWS... > I am not sure an agreement was already reached on > your proposal... There is no precise agreement yet - some interesting ideas have been discussed. But I didn't push, because there is no need to have a rule until we release 7.6. I will bring it up again when it becomes necessary. -- Joel