From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 26024 invoked by alias); 11 Dec 2012 06:51:45 -0000 Received: (qmail 26013 invoked by uid 22791); 11 Dec 2012 06:51:44 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_RCVD_UNTRUST,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 11 Dec 2012 06:51:36 +0000 Received: from int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.24]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id qBB6pXhV015080 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Tue, 11 Dec 2012 01:51:33 -0500 Received: from host2.jankratochvil.net (ovpn-116-35.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.116.35]) by int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id qBB6pSZp014082 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Tue, 11 Dec 2012 01:51:31 -0500 Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2012 06:51:00 -0000 From: Jan Kratochvil To: Joel Brobecker Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, Matt Rice , Pedro Alves Subject: Re: [doc patch] coding style: 0 vs. NULL + [patch] Code cleanup: skip.c Message-ID: <20121211065127.GA10815@host2.jankratochvil.net> References: <20121210184220.GA29321@host2.jankratochvil.net> <20121211015343.GM31477@adacore.com> <20121211060641.GA7775@host2.jankratochvil.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20121211060641.GA7775@host2.jankratochvil.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-12/txt/msg00307.txt.bz2 On Tue, 11 Dec 2012 07:06:41 +0100, Jan Kratochvil wrote: > OK if (first) > not great if (!first) > OK if (first == NULL) > OK if (first != NULL) > BAD if (first == 0) > BAD if (first != 0) BTW c++ -Wzero-as-null-pointer-constant warns only about the last two cases. Jan