Re: [4/10] RFC: unconditionally include signal.h

Joel Brobecker
2012-11-17T01:25:18Z

> > I think that checking for signal.h is pointless, because gdb already
> > includes it unconditionally in various places -- e.g., utils.c.
>
> It's not pointless in gdbserver. The HAVE_SIGNAL_H checks were added for
> the WinCE port. See fe7cf52e.

Should we consider using gnulib's signal.h?

--
Joel