Re: [4/10] RFC: unconditionally include signal.h

Pedro Alves
2012-11-16T17:18:27Z

On 15-11-2012 19:24, Tom Tromey wrote:
> I think that checking for signal.h is pointless, because gdb already
> includes it unconditionally in various places -- e.g., utils.c.

It's not pointless in gdbserver. The HAVE_SIGNAL_H checks were added for
the WinCE port. See fe7cf52e.

--
Pedro Alves