From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 17882 invoked by alias); 11 Dec 2012 03:11:52 -0000 Received: (qmail 17813 invoked by uid 22791); 11 Dec 2012 03:11:49 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_NO X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from rock.gnat.com (HELO rock.gnat.com) (205.232.38.15) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 11 Dec 2012 03:11:43 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0DE1F2E3A2; Mon, 10 Dec 2012 22:11:43 -0500 (EST) Received: from rock.gnat.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rock.gnat.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 3MvH3Z5hVlrb; Mon, 10 Dec 2012 22:11:42 -0500 (EST) Received: from joel.gnat.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 925E42E3A1; Mon, 10 Dec 2012 22:11:42 -0500 (EST) Received: by joel.gnat.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 9AAD1C3B05; Tue, 11 Dec 2012 07:11:22 +0400 (RET) Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2012 03:11:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: Tom Tromey Cc: Pedro Alves , gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [0/10] RFC: use gnulib more heavily + more configure fixes Message-ID: <20121211031122.GN31477@adacore.com> References: <87obiyzns7.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <50A67DE8.8040708@redhat.com> <87r4nebuzr.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <87wqwpd4hf.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87wqwpd4hf.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-12/txt/msg00294.txt.bz2 > I wonder whether anybody has tried it. I can try a few platforms, if you like. But I have so many platforms to test that what I usually do is let the automatic builders, which run nightly, tell me if there any problems on some of our platforms. (that's one way of saying that I deal with the problems after the fact). > In the absence of comments I think I will go ahead and put it all in. I'd go ahead. I think there were comments about some of them, though (IIRC?). -- Joel