From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 3141 invoked by alias); 7 Dec 2012 10:18:16 -0000 Received: (qmail 3126 invoked by uid 22791); 7 Dec 2012 10:18:15 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_NO X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from rock.gnat.com (HELO rock.gnat.com) (205.232.38.15) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 07 Dec 2012 10:18:11 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33E951C6FF3; Fri, 7 Dec 2012 05:18:11 -0500 (EST) Received: from rock.gnat.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rock.gnat.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id wiqMBb7YyD6c; Fri, 7 Dec 2012 05:18:11 -0500 (EST) Received: from joel.gnat.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE31D1C6FCD; Fri, 7 Dec 2012 05:18:10 -0500 (EST) Received: by joel.gnat.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id F3C71C3745; Fri, 7 Dec 2012 14:17:56 +0400 (RET) Date: Fri, 07 Dec 2012 10:18:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: Jerome Guitton Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [RFA/mingw32] environment variables are case-insensitive on win32 Message-ID: <20121207101756.GI31477@adacore.com> References: <834nk7urs0.fsf@gnu.org> <20121130140844.GF2768@adacore.com> <83y5hjt8ll.fsf@gnu.org> <20121130153401.GH2768@adacore.com> <83wqx3t6r9.fsf@gnu.org> <20121130162852.GD32262@adacore.com> <83pq2uudjj.fsf@gnu.org> <20121207092202.GJ7555@adacore.com> <20121207100631.GH31477@adacore.com> <20121207101106.GA17188@adacore.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20121207101106.GA17188@adacore.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-12/txt/msg00141.txt.bz2 > OK. As I was adding to an existing testcase I followed its style. > I can fix that for the whole testcase in an other commit. Thanks! In the middle of the test, my guess is that it's probably more logical to use return as opposed to untested, but I am a little fuzzy on that... -- Joel