From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 3454 invoked by alias); 7 Dec 2012 02:48:37 -0000 Received: (qmail 3436 invoked by uid 22791); 7 Dec 2012 02:48:35 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_NO X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from rock.gnat.com (HELO rock.gnat.com) (205.232.38.15) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 07 Dec 2012 02:48:29 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9CA0D2E192; Thu, 6 Dec 2012 21:48:28 -0500 (EST) Received: from rock.gnat.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rock.gnat.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id GGokHqrx8w6H; Thu, 6 Dec 2012 21:48:28 -0500 (EST) Received: from joel.gnat.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D66C2E180; Thu, 6 Dec 2012 21:48:27 -0500 (EST) Received: by joel.gnat.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id C6A76C0E21; Fri, 7 Dec 2012 06:48:13 +0400 (RET) Date: Fri, 07 Dec 2012 02:48:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: Luis Machado Cc: Andreas Schwab , Tom Tromey , gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix mi "-var-create" regression Message-ID: <20121207024813.GD31477@adacore.com> References: <5075D4FD.9050900@mentor.com> <20121014171805.GB3050@adacore.com> <507BFF97.2000900@codesourcery.com> <87y5j4ziof.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <508DB53E.30507@codesourcery.com> <20121129210737.GM3581@adacore.com> <50B81642.9020705@codesourcery.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <50B81642.9020705@codesourcery.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-12/txt/msg00124.txt.bz2 > True. Is this m68k? Did Andreas ever answer that question? > I'll have to find a register that is of type (void *) for all the > architectures. And do you absolutely need the register to be of type (void *) for the test to exercise the original problem? I don't know if we can find any that's guaranteed to be of any type. So you might have to use different register names depending on the target. -- Joel