From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 7381 invoked by alias); 1 Dec 2012 17:15:00 -0000 Received: (qmail 7356 invoked by uid 22791); 1 Dec 2012 17:14:58 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_RCVD_UNTRUST,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_W,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Sat, 01 Dec 2012 17:14:46 +0000 Received: from int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.23]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id qB1HEhQw012616 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Sat, 1 Dec 2012 12:14:43 -0500 Received: from host2.jankratochvil.net (ovpn-116-104.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.116.104]) by int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id qB1HEeiv024194 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Sat, 1 Dec 2012 12:14:42 -0500 Date: Sat, 01 Dec 2012 17:15:00 -0000 From: Jan Kratochvil To: iam ahal Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [patchv2] GDB 7.2: new feature for "backtrace" that cuts path to file (remain filename) Message-ID: <20121201171439.GA20612@host2.jankratochvil.net> References: <20121130185653.GA15394@host2.jankratochvil.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-12/txt/msg00002.txt.bz2 Hi Eldar, On Sat, 01 Dec 2012 00:09:28 +0100, iam ahal wrote: > Is this new patch (with your and my code) already committed to repository? no. (It would be marked as [commit] and some such wording would be there.) It is sent for a possible new review/comments although I do not expect any real changes in this part as it has been already thoroughly discussed before. But I would like your opinion whether this patch provides all the options like your original patch. One cannot directly compared it as the directories/filenames situation is now changed after you apply beforehand the patch: [patch] Limit DW_AT_comp_dir workaround only for gcc<=4.2 http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2012-11/msg00948.html Message-ID: <20121130173946.GA12865@host2.jankratochvil.net> Thanks, Jan