From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 13703 invoked by alias); 27 Nov 2012 16:52:24 -0000 Received: (qmail 13652 invoked by uid 22791); 27 Nov 2012 16:52:23 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_RCVD_UNTRUST,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_W,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS,TW_BJ X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 27 Nov 2012 16:52:14 +0000 Received: from int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.23]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id qARGq9GY013410 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Tue, 27 Nov 2012 11:52:09 -0500 Received: from host2.jankratochvil.net (ovpn-116-39.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.116.39]) by int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id qARGq3g6026364 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Tue, 27 Nov 2012 11:52:07 -0500 Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2012 16:52:00 -0000 From: Jan Kratochvil To: Pedro Alves Cc: markus.t.metzger@intel.com, gdb-patches@sourceware.org, markus.t.metzger@gmail.com, tromey@redhat.com, kettenis@gnu.org Subject: Re: [patch v4 01/13] disas: add precise instructions flag Message-ID: <20121127165202.GA5914@host2.jankratochvil.net> References: <1354013351-14791-1-git-send-email-markus.t.metzger@intel.com> <1354013351-14791-2-git-send-email-markus.t.metzger@intel.com> <50B4EF0E.8080102@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <50B4EF0E.8080102@redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-11/txt/msg00755.txt.bz2 On Tue, 27 Nov 2012 17:49:18 +0100, Pedro Alves wrote: > On 11/27/2012 10:48 AM, markus.t.metzger@intel.com wrote: > > From: Markus Metzger > > > > When disassembling an address range with interleaved sources, > > What you mean by interleaved? "disasm /m" ? > > > the addresses that > > are being disassembled may not exactly match the specified range. > > Is this another symptom of the issue that "disasm /m" sorts by > line number, rather than the much more reasonable sort-by-address, > which is IIRC what objdump does too? objdump does it differently (IMO corrently) than GDB: Tracked at: disassemble/m should be PC-driven, not source line driven http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11833 Jan