From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 21610 invoked by alias); 19 Nov 2012 22:27:22 -0000 Received: (qmail 21574 invoked by uid 22791); 19 Nov 2012 22:27:20 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_NO X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from rock.gnat.com (HELO rock.gnat.com) (205.232.38.15) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 19 Nov 2012 22:27:16 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D2FF2E3D1; Mon, 19 Nov 2012 17:27:15 -0500 (EST) Received: from rock.gnat.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rock.gnat.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 4xStXD9T4JTS; Mon, 19 Nov 2012 17:27:15 -0500 (EST) Received: from joel.gnat.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5CEA62E112; Mon, 19 Nov 2012 17:27:15 -0500 (EST) Received: by joel.gnat.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id B30CDC2D71; Mon, 19 Nov 2012 14:27:10 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2012 22:27:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: Pierre Muller Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: New ARI warning Fri Nov 16 01:56:44 UTC 2012 Message-ID: <20121119222710.GC9964@adacore.com> References: <20121116015644.GA22323@sourceware.org> <20121116021950.GH3790@adacore.com> <000001cdc3de$d649cfd0$82dd6f70$@muller@ics-cnrs.unistra.fr> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <000001cdc3de$d649cfd0$82dd6f70$@muller@ics-cnrs.unistra.fr> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-11/txt/msg00520.txt.bz2 > Should I switch to sending emails from these scripts? > The current problem is that branch doesn't have contrib./ari directory > yet, so I can only do this for trunk... I would defer to you over what makes most sense for you. As for the branch, I think adding them to the release branch would be zero risk. If that makes it easier for you, you can add them there as well. -- Joel