From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 31852 invoked by alias); 16 Nov 2012 14:45:34 -0000 Received: (qmail 31841 invoked by uid 22791); 16 Nov 2012 14:45:32 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_NO X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from rock.gnat.com (HELO rock.gnat.com) (205.232.38.15) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 16 Nov 2012 14:45:27 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 265222E213; Fri, 16 Nov 2012 09:45:27 -0500 (EST) Received: from rock.gnat.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rock.gnat.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id L3yb2i9DNdEw; Fri, 16 Nov 2012 09:45:27 -0500 (EST) Received: from joel.gnat.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 642A32E215; Fri, 16 Nov 2012 09:45:25 -0500 (EST) Received: by joel.gnat.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 38FDAC880A; Fri, 16 Nov 2012 06:45:23 -0800 (PST) Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2012 14:45:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: Eli Zaretskii Cc: tromey@redhat.com, gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [10/10] RFC: remove gdb_wait.h Message-ID: <20121116144523.GK3790@adacore.com> References: <87obiyzns7.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <87wqxmwthq.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <83wqxmsi32.fsf@gnu.org> <20121115210828.GG3790@adacore.com> <83txsqrmfu.fsf@gnu.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <83txsqrmfu.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-11/txt/msg00460.txt.bz2 > With my previous Windows-related contribution to gnulib collecting > dust since January, without any reason (the RM agreed that the code > was correct and should be admitted), why would I bother to submit > another one? I'm very sorry to hear that you've had problems submitting one patch. But I hope you're not going to let that discourage you. We are not without our own hicups too, and hopefully they are only occasional, and can be taken care of with a few pings. -- Joel