From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 18773 invoked by alias); 15 Nov 2012 17:48:15 -0000 Received: (qmail 18763 invoked by uid 22791); 15 Nov 2012 17:48:14 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_NO X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from rock.gnat.com (HELO rock.gnat.com) (205.232.38.15) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 15 Nov 2012 17:48:07 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B52B92E092; Thu, 15 Nov 2012 12:48:06 -0500 (EST) Received: from rock.gnat.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rock.gnat.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 3MkDLAKKvqiV; Thu, 15 Nov 2012 12:48:06 -0500 (EST) Received: from joel.gnat.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B0212E054; Thu, 15 Nov 2012 12:48:06 -0500 (EST) Received: by joel.gnat.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id AC64EC87DF; Thu, 15 Nov 2012 09:48:04 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2012 17:48:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: Marc Khouzam Cc: "'lgustavo@codesourcery.com'" , 'Tom Tromey' , "'gdb-patches@sourceware.org'" Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix mi "-var-create" regression Message-ID: <20121115174804.GE3790@adacore.com> References: <5075D4FD.9050900@mentor.com> <20121014171805.GB3050@adacore.com> <507BFF97.2000900@codesourcery.com> <87y5j4ziof.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <508DB53E.30507@codesourcery.com> <87625rwvcp.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <50A3EF5D.4060607@codesourcery.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-11/txt/msg00417.txt.bz2 > Nice! > Is it possible to put this in the 7_5 branch? I haven't looked at the patch itself, but at this point, we really want any of them to be extra safe. If the approver thinks so, then it can go in. -- Joel