From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 24702 invoked by alias); 12 Nov 2012 15:51:17 -0000 Received: (qmail 24673 invoked by uid 22791); 12 Nov 2012 15:51:15 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_NO X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from rock.gnat.com (HELO rock.gnat.com) (205.232.38.15) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 12 Nov 2012 15:51:10 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E22641C7F2F; Mon, 12 Nov 2012 10:51:09 -0500 (EST) Received: from rock.gnat.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rock.gnat.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id sjkJubVRIYFx; Mon, 12 Nov 2012 10:51:09 -0500 (EST) Received: from joel.gnat.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C2841C7E9A; Mon, 12 Nov 2012 10:51:09 -0500 (EST) Received: by joel.gnat.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id D80C3C49E9; Mon, 12 Nov 2012 07:50:53 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2012 15:51:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: Pierre Muller Cc: 'Pedro Alves' , devans@sourceware.org, gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: PING: [RFA] Fix New ARI warning Tue Nov 6 01:58:48 UTC 2012 Message-ID: <20121112155053.GS5103@adacore.com> References: <20121106015848.GA5296@sourceware.org> <5098efb2.05fd440a.7696.ffffd821SMTPIN_ADDED@mx.google.com> <50995EBB.6070503@redhat.com> <001b01cdc0b6$7e7b67d0$7b723770$@muller@ics-cnrs.unistra.fr> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <001b01cdc0b6$7e7b67d0$7b723770$@muller@ics-cnrs.unistra.fr> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-11/txt/msg00282.txt.bz2 > There is probably a list of other similar functions that we should > obsolete. Can you tell us which functions you have in mind? > 1-- Brutal method: > Remove function from both header and C sources > as well as from ARI script. I'd go with this approach. -- Joel