From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 14065 invoked by alias); 7 Nov 2012 13:48:02 -0000 Received: (qmail 14036 invoked by uid 22791); 7 Nov 2012 13:48:01 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_RCVD_UNTRUST,KHOP_SPAMHAUS_DROP,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_W,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 07 Nov 2012 13:47:47 +0000 Received: from int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.24]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id qA7Dllgc028216 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Wed, 7 Nov 2012 08:47:47 -0500 Received: from host2.jankratochvil.net (ovpn-116-26.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.116.26]) by int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id qA7DlhH8025094 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Wed, 7 Nov 2012 08:47:45 -0500 Date: Wed, 07 Nov 2012 13:48:00 -0000 From: Jan Kratochvil To: Siddhesh Poyarekar Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] bitpos expansion summary reloaded Message-ID: <20121107134742.GA26600@host2.jankratochvil.net> References: <20120929173938.GA2987@host2.jankratochvil.net> <20120929181141.GA4009@host2.jankratochvil.net> <20120930065211.GA21118@host2.jankratochvil.net> <20121003184155.03dceed4@spoyarek> <20121003195627.GA17283@host2.jankratochvil.net> <20121004071314.GA4292@host2.jankratochvil.net> <20121021130546.02ea680c@spoyarek> <20121025155412.GA16619@host2.jankratochvil.net> <20121025222123.68c7b118@spoyarek> <20121106200117.GA4110@host2.jankratochvil.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20121106200117.GA4110@host2.jankratochvil.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-11/txt/msg00141.txt.bz2 On Tue, 06 Nov 2012 21:01:17 +0100, Jan Kratochvil wrote: > start just normally fixing all the warnings for -Wconversion other possibility is just to target the 64-bit offsets avoid the -Wconversion fixes mostly unrelated to it. This is a repeating issue like the checked-in cu_offset vs. sect_offset, therefore to use something like: typedef struct { int64_t x; } ssize64_type; (There was some complain on reversed *_t types, therefore I used _type.)))) I will yet see how beneficial are the -Wconversion fixes, I believe not much so the ssize64_type way may be at least easier to implement. BTW it would be all sure much easier with C++ and its operator overloading. Regards, Jan