From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 24841 invoked by alias); 5 Nov 2012 17:28:43 -0000 Received: (qmail 24832 invoked by uid 22791); 5 Nov 2012 17:28:42 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_NO X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from rock.gnat.com (HELO rock.gnat.com) (205.232.38.15) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 05 Nov 2012 17:28:34 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A3C31C7D4E; Mon, 5 Nov 2012 12:28:33 -0500 (EST) Received: from rock.gnat.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rock.gnat.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id eN1AySH-XB0x; Mon, 5 Nov 2012 12:28:33 -0500 (EST) Received: from joel.gnat.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A72C1C7D3D; Mon, 5 Nov 2012 12:28:33 -0500 (EST) Received: by joel.gnat.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 0F178C6822; Mon, 5 Nov 2012 09:28:29 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 05 Nov 2012 17:28:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: Pierre Muller Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [RFA] Add myself as responsible of contrib/ari directory Message-ID: <20121105172828.GB2972@adacore.com> References: <002d01cdbb44$c31361d0$493a2570$@muller@ics-cnrs.unistra.fr> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <002d01cdbb44$c31361d0$493a2570$@muller@ics-cnrs.unistra.fr> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-11/txt/msg00086.txt.bz2 > 2012-11-05 Pierre Muller > > * MAINTAINERS (Responsible Maintainers/misc): Add myself > as responsible of contrib/ari directory. I think that this is a good location for putting that piece of information in. Note that, by adding yourself, you are adding yourself as a Maintainer, which means that you agree to the responsbility of maintaining this area of the code, including reviews and self-approvals. You've been the de facto maintainer when the scripts were on the server side rather than in the GDB sources, so I assume the rest of the Global Maintainers group would agree to this. Let's give it a week, to give people time to object. -- Joel