From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 19009 invoked by alias); 25 Oct 2012 16:52:26 -0000 Received: (qmail 18991 invoked by uid 22791); 25 Oct 2012 16:52:21 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_RCVD_UNTRUST,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_W,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 25 Oct 2012 16:52:14 +0000 Received: from int-mx12.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx12.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.25]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q9PGqDd8004047 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Thu, 25 Oct 2012 12:52:13 -0400 Received: from spoyarek (vpn1-7-6.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.7.6]) by int-mx12.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q9PGqAv3022257; Thu, 25 Oct 2012 12:52:12 -0400 Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2012 16:52:00 -0000 From: Siddhesh Poyarekar To: Jan Kratochvil Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] bitpos expansion summary reloaded Message-ID: <20121025222123.68c7b118@spoyarek> In-Reply-To: <20121025155412.GA16619@host2.jankratochvil.net> References: <20120927190053.1e7de264@spoyarek> <20120929173938.GA2987@host2.jankratochvil.net> <20120929181141.GA4009@host2.jankratochvil.net> <20120930065211.GA21118@host2.jankratochvil.net> <20121003184155.03dceed4@spoyarek> <20121003195627.GA17283@host2.jankratochvil.net> <20121004071314.GA4292@host2.jankratochvil.net> <20121021130546.02ea680c@spoyarek> <20121025155412.GA16619@host2.jankratochvil.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-10/txt/msg00499.txt.bz2 On Thu, 25 Oct 2012 17:54:12 +0200, Jan wrote: > we will go with the fix without the full -Wconversion fix. > > As most of the patches are very mechanical could you write a script > which will try to separate the "clear" and human-review parts? > > "clear" I find that the patch is understood by the script (that is it > is some s/int/LONGEST/ etc.) and that it does remove >= 1 > -Wconversion warnings. > > Otherwise I will write such script. I hope it would "approve" most > of the patches. It would be great if you could do this. I won't be able to get on it this week. Thanks, Siddhesh