From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 3046 invoked by alias); 24 Oct 2012 15:05:54 -0000 Received: (qmail 3037 invoked by uid 22791); 24 Oct 2012 15:05:53 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_THREADED,RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from sibelius.xs4all.nl (HELO glazunov.sibelius.xs4all.nl) (83.163.83.176) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 24 Oct 2012 15:05:49 +0000 Received: from glazunov.sibelius.xs4all.nl (kettenis@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by glazunov.sibelius.xs4all.nl (8.14.5/8.14.3) with ESMTP id q9OF5hR6031183; Wed, 24 Oct 2012 17:05:43 +0200 (CEST) Received: (from kettenis@localhost) by glazunov.sibelius.xs4all.nl (8.14.5/8.14.3/Submit) id q9OF5fOg003231; Wed, 24 Oct 2012 17:05:41 +0200 (CEST) Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2012 15:05:00 -0000 Message-Id: <201210241505.q9OF5fOg003231@glazunov.sibelius.xs4all.nl> From: Mark Kettenis To: jan.kratochvil@redhat.com CC: gdb-patches@sourceware.org In-reply-to: <20121024145006.GA29345@host2.jankratochvil.net> (message from Jan Kratochvil on Wed, 24 Oct 2012 16:50:06 +0200) Subject: Re: [testsuite commit] Fix -m32 results [Re: [PATCH] Remove some KPASSes in gdb.base/callfuncs.exp] References: <201210231827.q9NIRdld028342@glazunov.sibelius.xs4all.nl> <20121024134828.GA24180@host2.jankratochvil.net> <201210241435.q9OEZhoL009488@glazunov.sibelius.xs4all.nl> <20121024145006.GA29345@host2.jankratochvil.net> Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-10/txt/msg00460.txt.bz2 > Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2012 16:50:06 +0200 > From: Jan Kratochvil > > On Wed, 24 Oct 2012 16:35:43 +0200, Mark Kettenis wrote: > > Your "fix" has an annoying side-effect. Took me a while to figure out > > where the: > > > > Executing on host: gcc -c -o ilp3216410.o ilp3216410.c (timeout = 300) > > spawn gcc -c -o ilp3216410.o ilp3216410.c > > Executing on host: gcc -c -o reg6416410.o reg6416410.s (timeout = 300) > > spawn gcc -c -o reg6416410.o reg6416410.s > > reg6416410.s: Assembler messages: > > reg6416410.s:9: Error: bad register name `%r8' > > reg6416410.s:10: Error: bad register name `%r9' > > reg6416410.s:11: Error: bad register name `%r10' > > reg6416410.s:12: Error: bad register name `%r11' > > reg6416410.s:13: Error: bad register name `%r12' > > reg6416410.s:14: Error: bad register name `%r13' > > reg6416410.s:15: Error: bad register name `%r14' > > reg6416410.s:16: Error: bad register name `%r15' > > compiler exited with status 1 > > output is: > > reg6416410.s: Assembler messages: > > reg6416410.s:9: Error: bad register name `%r8' > > reg6416410.s:10: Error: bad register name `%r9' > > reg6416410.s:11: Error: bad register name `%r10' > > reg6416410.s:12: Error: bad register name `%r11' > > reg6416410.s:15: Error: bad register name `%r14' > > reg6416410.s:16: Error: bad register name `%r15' > > > > in the middle of my test output came from. > > It always happens for those is_ilp32_target & co. functions. But it is only > in gdb.log, not in gdb.sum. Well gdb.log is what I actually look at when I'm trying to fix a bug. Which I did, so the issue is gone from callfuncs.exp. Easier than arguing about it. Cheers, Mark